Ayelet Waldman smiling
Ayelet Waldman (File photo)

Berkeley-based author and left-wing critic of Israel Ayelet Waldman has challenged the Jewish state to block her husband, Pulitzer Prize-winning author Michael Chabon, from entering when the couple visits in June.

https://twitter.com/ayeletw/status/859437113007144960

“I think it’s despicable to say that if you are in opposition, as many Israelis are, to illegal occupation,” Waldman told J. in a telephone interview. “Building settlements is illegal activity, so every settlement is essentially criminal. The idea that a country that calls itself a democracy bans from its shores people who oppose criminal activity, it’s despicable.”

Israel cannot bar Waldman from entering, because she holds Israeli citizenship. But Chabon does not.

In early March, Israel’s Knesset passed a law that bans entry to foreigners who publicly call for boycotting Israel or its settlements. Haaretz reported Tuesday that Israel is taking border control to “new extremes” with its tourist bans.

Both Waldman and Chabon are vocal critics of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. After a visit to the West Bank Chabon described the Israeli occupation “the worst thing I have ever seen, just purely in terms of injustice.”

Chabon and Waldman have co-edited a collection of essays entitled “Kingdom of Olives and Ash” that is set to be released May 30, marking 50 years since the Six-Day War and the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.

Waldman said, “I just bought plane tickets and [the occupation] sickens me, because I love Israel. I’m Israeli, and I want Israel to be around forever.”

J. covers our community better than any other source and provides news you can't find elsewhere. Support local Jewish journalism and give to J. today. Your donation will help J. survive and thrive!

Max A. Cherney is a former J. staff writer.

10 replies on “Ayelet Waldman to Israel: Go ahead — I dare you”

  1. every country has the right to determine who and who does not enter it. but they wont block the chabons, although they should.

    1. One can hope they will be interviewed, and expelled, by the same border policemen who sent the Gazan Arab back to America elsewhere in the J.

  2. Here’s an example of how the new law is giving our enemies ammunition. It’s strong enough to handle little people like Waldman and Chabon. It’s the activists, the hardliners who go around rabble rousing who should be kept out, not self-lauding liberals.

    1. @Shimon Waldman and Chabon have publicly announced their advocacy of BDS, a Palestinian war “by other means” against Israel. They are not just “self-lauding liberals”. They are explicitly advocating for the Palestinian cause in its endless war against Israel. No other country admits avowed subversives. Why should Israel?

  3. ISN’T IT A PUBLICITY STUNT TO SELL A BOOK?

    The problem with Waldman’s tirade is that she starts from a false premise, that the settlements are illegal, and then goes into a groundless, self-righteous wing-ding which has nothing to do with reality. The fact is that under the UN partition resolution of 1947 Jews have a right to live in every part of the former Palestine Mandate until such time as a Palestinian state with normalized relations with Israel exists. The Palestinians have been offered such a state endlessly, from 1947 right down to today, and have violently rejected it. The ever-so-modest Waldman seems not to know this.

    But let us not kid ourselves. Waldman’s criticisms of Israel have nothing whatever to do with her erroneous understanding of the legality of the settlements. Everything about her manner and rhetoric is that not of a critic of israel, but of an enemy. Her “I dare you” is hard to understand as other than belligerent. Not critical, belligerent.

    Her husband, Michael Chabon, says ““the worst thing I have ever seen, just purely in terms of injustice.” Does anyone really doubt that he believed that before he went to Judea? What he said is not an observation. It is a political posture – an alternate fact, as we say in America.

    Together with the “I dare you” remark, it is hard not to understand this whole attempt to get arrested at the airport as a publicity stunt to sell Chabon’s upcoming book.

    Boycotts work both ways. Waldman and Chabon are free to boycott Israel, including, if they are not hypocrites, the pharmaceuticals. And we are equally free to boycott ever buying another of Chabon’s or Waldman’s books. Ever.

    Here is a partial list of the pharmaceuticals developed by Teva, Israel’s largest pharma company. Waldman and Chabon, either stop taking every one of these or admit your hypocrisy and shut up about a boycott. Check your medicine cabinet to find out if you are a boycott hypocrite or not:

    Adderall (generic and branded)

    Adrucil

    Alprazolam

    Amikacin Sulfate

    Amitriptyline

    Amoxicillin

    Apri

    Aripiprazole (generic)

    Atomoxetine

    Atorvastatin

    Augmentin (generic)

    Aviane

    Azathioprine

    Azithromycin

    Baclofen

    Balziva

    Bisoprolol Fumarate

    Bleomycin

    Budeprion

    Budesonide

    Buspirone

    Calcitriol

    Camrese

    Carboplatin

    Cefdinir

    Cephalexin

    Ciclosporin

    Ciprofloxacin

    Citalopram

    Cetirizine

    Claravis

    Clarithromycin

    Clonazepam

    Clozapine

    Codeine

    Copaxone

    Cryselle

    Cyclosporine

    Daunorubicin

    Dexmethylphenidate

    Dextroamphetamine

    Diazepam

    Dihydrocodeine

    Doxorubicin HCl

    Enpresse

    Epirubicin HCl

    Epoprostenol Sodium

    Errin

    Escitalopram

    Estazolam

    Estradiol

    Etodolac

    Famciclovir

    Filgrastim

    Fiorinal[66]

    Flunitrazepam

    Fluocinonide

    Fluconazole

    Fluoxetine

    Fluvoxamine

    Gabapentin

    Haloperidol

    Haloperidol Decanoate

    Ibuprofen Max

    Idarubicin HCl

    Ifosfamide

    Irinotecan

    Gianvi

    Irbesartan

    Junel

    Kariva

    Kelnor

    Lamotrigine

    Laquinimod

    Letrozole

    Leucovorin Calcium

    Losartan

    Methotrexate

    Methylphenidate

    Mirtazapine

    Mitoxantrone

    Montelukast (generic) [67]

    Naltrexone

    Naproxen[citation needed]

    Norepinephrine

    Norethisterone

    Nortrel

    Nortriptyline

    Nuvigil

    Nystatin

    Ocella

    Olanzapine

    Omeprazole

    Optalgin

    Oxycodone

    Oxymorphone

    Pantoprazole[68]

    Phentermine

    Portia

    Pravastatin

    Prednisolone

    ProAir

    Provigil

    Quetiapine

    QVAR

    QNASL

    Ramipril

    Rasagiline

    Salbutamol (Albuterol)

    Sertraline

    Simvastatin

    Sprintec

    Sulfamethoxazole Trimethoprim

    Sumatriptan

    Tamoxifen

    Temazepam

    Temozolomide

    Terbinafin

    Topiramate

    Trazodone

    Tri-Sprintec

    Ursodiol

    Velivet

    Venlafaxine

    Warfarin

    Zolpidem

  4. Israel is a pseudo democracy that is without a constitution based on the universal rights of mankind. And we all know why they don’t have one. Its much easier to be a fascist state when there is no constitution.

    1. How many parties does your country have in its parliament / congress, James? Israel has over a dozen. How many parties do fascist countries have. One. James, do you think you might come off looking less ignorant if you actually knew what you were talking about?

  5. Tough issue, because as it is Israel is a country that has suffered terrorist attacks in the past so I see why they want to close the country to people who have expressed anti-Israel views. That said, however, it goes into freedom of speech issues too, and everyone should have the right to speak their mind, without a government telling them what they are or not allowed to say.

    1. The Israeli government is not restricting what Waldman can say in her own country. But they have every right to restrain the political activity of disseminators of hostile foreign propaganda in their country. Contrary to the general Left article of faith that every country in the world has sovereign rights except Israel, the Israelis for some reason have gotten the odd idea that they have sovereign rights too. And that not even Waldman’s apparent belief that she is somehow above the law when the law is merely an Israeli law, actually puts her above the law.

      1. What do you mean israel does not have sovereign rights? It does, doesn’t it?

Comments are closed.